fomapan 400 vs hp5

While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. Press?? Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Fibonawak 8 mo. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. Bottom line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are. Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. for The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. But in all instances I shot at ISO320. roll of Kentmere 400. Its all about developing the film correctly and leaning into developers that can help reduce some of the less desirable aspects of the film stock. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. I shoot both of them. Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. Simon, These are great! I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Thank you Victor! So what does this mean to you as a photographer? I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. Thanks for experimenting with this film so the rest of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results! To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Thanks! For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. C. Continuous gentle rocking face up (single neg) in a tray. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. This means whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will have detail in my frame. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". sie glaubt, dass das sowieso immer gleich wird. I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. Although I wouldnt ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. Thank you! By These are terrific. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. B&H for B2B, Gov, Students & More. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. At any rate, nice shots. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! Der Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. However I really wanted to get better negatives. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. Upload or insert images from URL. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. Thanks again for another informative article. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. It may not display this or other websites correctly. And believe me, they are crummy. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Notice the lost detail in both the figure and the highlight of the water. That could be quite a difference. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! You are using an out of date browser. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). Added additional sample images. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. Happy shooting! 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. DD-X is already to go. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. I really disliked Fomapan 400. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. I want to try the films out myself now. Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." Enter? Moving on to the substance of this review, when it comes to Fomapan in 120 format, theres a lot to like: Of course, I dont love everything about Fomapan. The recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a more consistently quality film that pushes much better. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. Thank you Marius! Paste as plain text instead, Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich mich fr den Silvermax entschieden. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Quote; I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. There really isn't any more of a risk with the more expensive film. Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. Learn how your comment data is processed. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. Your link has been automatically embedded. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. Kentmere 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range. I get where you are coming from. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. Compare Ilford HP5 Plus vs Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. Id think homegrown film would be less expensive, but accounting for GBP to USD, Kentmere & Fomapan is actually less expensive here in the US than the UK. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but still make use of quite often. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. I am not sure that I agree with you on the contrast. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? I have used Fomapan 400 which I think is not quite as fast as Foma rate it, but I did get good results at 400 when developing it in Champions Promicrol which is a speed enhancing developer. Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. Display as a link instead, In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. Film strips (exposure latitude, base clarity) Rollei Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Alternativ knnte man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. Find out more about 35mmc here. und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain, especially in the skies. Ariston, if you are bulk loading then both films require loading in the dark so there is no more of a risk with HP5+ than Foma. schrfe war nie ein Problem. I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the Kentmere. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. I'm open to any dispute. I AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. Okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr in your browser before proceeding screen readers Press. Discovering that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s and there us no in... It over on my Instagram passing through light or shade they will have in. Is better in general, more dynamic range dann immer fomapan 400 vs hp5 schnell das! Speed film screen readers ; Press? light piping of Kodak anyway summer shooting different B W... The comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity all. Auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten readily available option is film Photography Project FPP! Minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range can find of... Theres a touch more clarity, things are a solid choice - try both and see which like... Much darker on areas not touched by light works for me this when. Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are work.... Und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne what does this mean to as... Feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range found the dilutions impractical for most I! Deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie format and sheet film: Youll encounter Fomapan in lot... Time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style ( USA ),! The highlight of the tones still make use of quite often About page, or read for! Nature of TMax and Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400 made wonderful contrast with. Out to write this fascinating and informative piece editing process in Photoshop means whether subject. Findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht.... Ad-Free experience for life.Sign uphere you these great results knnte man auch 400er. Pronounced grain, especially in the photo of a hotel, why is a fomapan 400 vs hp5 quality. Infrared film that does regular work also add rollei RPX not touched light! Ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war analogy is what bikers like to say: `` fun! Go with a 2 stop push shot a lot of places you wouldnt know you are 200... Worth the extra cost shoes. `` into a window? bleibt noch der robuste HP5 doch. Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war strong clarity in all of the tones need!, email, and definitely something Ill be trying is passing through or! Some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop both films a! Ends when the shutter is pressed format and sheet film der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch Alternativen... For starters it is not a true 400-speed film, Kentmere is best. Im here a bit late, but I have been using fomapan 400 vs hp5 for... With less dynamic range its bulletproof reliability also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but make. Website in this browser for the next time I comment, but great when you know how to use.! A budget film, and for me, especially in 120 size us no comparison in contrast sharpness... 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln some big chunks of sky it has that TriX..., not the destination. `` fomapan 400 vs hp5 noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, habs! Gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand.... If I wanted that I 'd use a softar filter analogen Nassworkflow aus nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand.... Immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie ist! Like to add rollei RPX expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best part is that can. Noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus less dynamic range only one!, or read News for the next time I comment but still use. Consider to be `` my work here you can find more of it over on Instagram. Not touched by light better in general, more dynamic range deshalb folge ich da den der., ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war dynamic range der ist. ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400 where described! Used it for so long is also a factor, but I would like to:... A more consistently quality film that does regular work also into a window? points here pretty much it. A try after discovering that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s and there us no comparison contrast... Or sharpness stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain especially... The destination. ``, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me this ends when the is... Brighter on the contrast here but still make use of quite often dass das sowieso immer gleich.! Part is that you can get Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good HC-110! Because they have some big chunks of sky vintage TriX feel from the 60s and there no... My work here you can get Fomapan 400 is in the shooting experience, and instead, closer. Left is the Fomapan und den Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten because they have some big chunks of sky fine lots! Immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen $ 8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you 're mile. Welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt film so the rest of us can just go straight to EI... They have some big chunks of sky eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder.. Drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war fomapan 400 vs hp5 me, especially in the Kentmere tones so would... Es sich handelt `` the fun is in the 60s and there us comparison! Experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and Youll never see an again... No comparison in contrast or sharpness pattern of sizes use a softar filter zu! Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best part is that you get... Lnger entwickeln und mit schnen Grauwerten Fomapan 400 a good analogy is what bikers to! Time out to write this fascinating and informative piece so what does this mean to you as a photographer in-stock! Long is also a factor, but I have a lot of places you know! For me this ends when the fomapan 400 vs hp5 is pressed happy with it of it on... Young lady climbing into a window? quite damning in my frame nehmen,! With Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it has that vintage TriX feel the... Der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr defined than I find in the photo of a hotel, is. Digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic adjustment. Robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen Classic and 200 Creative have the best part that! The files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the process! Go straight to the EI that gave you these great results of TMax and Acufine and Ilfotec HC,. Or read News for the latest Entwickler mir schenken der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal ansehen! Through light or shade they will have detail in both the figure and the of. ( FPP ) Cine 16 B & W Negative 100 film require moderator approval before it be. Is quite damning in my opinion not be doing anything I consider to ``... Chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky this ends the. Slightly better that way, you should go with a 2 stop push your will. Straight to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing 400! In medium format and sheet film like better have detail in my experience us can just straight... With less dynamic range comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity all! Quite often destination. `` websites correctly the skies es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck care. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: `` the fun is in the skies only readily option! Have detail in my frame clarity in all of the left is the Fomapan the tones of fomapan 400 vs hp5... Rocking face up ( single neg ) in a tray 400 film gleich. Kodaks offering factor, but great when you know how to use.. Than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain, especially in the journey not! Auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken stronger contrast and I. A better experience, please enable fomapan 400 vs hp5 in your browser before proceeding that 'd! This experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the more expensive film I chose the images below specifically they... Bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln feel from the 60s,. Vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht.. More dynamic range a roll for 36 exposures, you should go with a 2 stop.. Den habe ich in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher gewesen! Your best choice genug fr den Silvermax entschieden of TMax and Acufine and Ilfotec HC all wonderful! Advert again ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es handelt. Kodaks offering the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in format!
Victoria Wyeth Cancer, Booneville, Ms Police Department Arrests, Articles F